Home |
||||||||
LEMoN Armoury Thesaurus (LAT)
|
Key to abbreviations for showing term relationships in the thesaurus: BT Broader Term USE (Full form, i.e. Unabbreviated) |
Equivalence relationships are indicated by USE (followed by a Preferred Term) AND UF (followed by a Non Preferred Term) references.
Examples:
bastard sword
USE: hand-and-a-half
Centre of Percussion
UF: sweet spot
Hierarchical relationships are those that exist between a class and its subclasses, between a broader category and a narrower category. BT and NT references are used to indicate hierarchical relationships.
Example:
edged weapons
BT: weapons
NT: swords
Associative relationships are indicated by the RT notation. RTs are conceptually related to the main heading but do not fall directly under equivalence or hierarchical relationships. Part-whole relationships or near synonyms are typical examples of associative relationships. Users of the thesaurus and indexers may find it useful to look up given RTs to help select the most suitable term for their particular need.
Example:
forging
RT: stock-removal
RT: tempering
All term relationships in the thesaurus are referenced reciprocally:
USE <- reciprocates -> UF
Example:
bastard sword |
Reciprocal entry: hand-and-a-half |
BT <- reciprocates -> NT
Example:
edged weapons |
Reciprocal entry: weapons |
RT <- reciprocates -> RT
Example:
forging |
Reciprocal entry: stock-removal |
*Displays
The primary version of LAT currently uses the Alphabetical Display.
Alternate displays of the LAT are currently under development. As these are yet to be completed, only a sample is given here for illustrative purposes.
The Top-Term Display lists the top terms that are at the highest level of a hierarchy (i.e. the broadest terms) and the narrow terms that are classified in lower levels under them.
The Hierarchical Display shows all the terms in the thesaurus and the way other terms are related to each term.
Since language is dynamic, term status and term relationships can change over time. Certain Preferred Terms may become obsolete and their status may be downgraded to a UF term, while some node labels may one day attain “approved” status and become the authoritative form, or Preferred Term. Given this fact, the LAT is an ongoing project that is constantly being maintained and updated.